Madden NFL 23 owner know they are able to convince players by promising lesser practice time in exchange for Madden 23 Coins greater games, but many retired players, including myself, would've taken greater money to increased amount of practice time. The main goal of Madden NFL 23 owners is to lure players by offering less of everything prior to the start of the regular season, I am of the opinion that this is not one of the main reasons Madden NFL 23 players decide on 17 games.
More money and better health benefits are what players should be fighting for
The players see themselves as equals in this deal and moving from 17 to 17 games increase the risk of injury and an accelerated career. They'd like to have more than the owners are willing to offeran amount of 48.5 percentage of revenuesthe amount needed to bring it about. I think that an increase of 49 percent could get the owners to accept 17 games, and 50 percent is sure to be enough to make an agreement.
The question is what else could be associated in the proposed 17-games? Are the increases in retirement benefits as well as minimum salaries linked to the 17-game idea? Could they be wiped out if players aren't in agreement with 17 games? If yes, would better pay for younger players and additional benefits for retired players outweigh not getting more than 49 or 50 per cent of revenue?
Some players might agree that it does. Taking care of the entire group is the primary goal of the union, and even if giving up a tenth or two would give the primary players more money in their pockets they'd want it.
Also, most players would like their Week 17 pay to be comparable to what they earn for the remainder of the season. For now, the salary would be limited to $250.000 per game for that extra game. But, Peter King reported in his Football Morning in America column that players may request additional compensation from their teams for Buy Mut Coins Madden 23 Week 17. In the midst of requests for additional funds, this appears like it's probably the easiest to obtain.
More money and better health benefits are what players should be fighting for
The players see themselves as equals in this deal and moving from 17 to 17 games increase the risk of injury and an accelerated career. They'd like to have more than the owners are willing to offeran amount of 48.5 percentage of revenuesthe amount needed to bring it about. I think that an increase of 49 percent could get the owners to accept 17 games, and 50 percent is sure to be enough to make an agreement.
The question is what else could be associated in the proposed 17-games? Are the increases in retirement benefits as well as minimum salaries linked to the 17-game idea? Could they be wiped out if players aren't in agreement with 17 games? If yes, would better pay for younger players and additional benefits for retired players outweigh not getting more than 49 or 50 per cent of revenue?
Some players might agree that it does. Taking care of the entire group is the primary goal of the union, and even if giving up a tenth or two would give the primary players more money in their pockets they'd want it.
Also, most players would like their Week 17 pay to be comparable to what they earn for the remainder of the season. For now, the salary would be limited to $250.000 per game for that extra game. But, Peter King reported in his Football Morning in America column that players may request additional compensation from their teams for Buy Mut Coins Madden 23 Week 17. In the midst of requests for additional funds, this appears like it's probably the easiest to obtain.
Comments (0)